Thursday, April 11, 2013

Dear Mr. President


Thursday, April 11, 2013

Dear Mr. President.

I am writing today as one of the "nut cakes" Chris Matthews and Dana Milbank referred to on Hardball last night. Their commentary and attitudes toward the "old timers", (the players of 50 years ago, like Senator Sanders, "the finest Vermont Senator ever to be born in Brooklyn" who perhaps was relevant in 68 and 69, but who now is just out for "old timers night.",) was yet another window in to how narrow is the  vision of the  "insiders" those who are insulated and out of touch with the lives that real people are living every day. It is hard to see that reality when one is looking through a $5,000,000 a year income.
These two  followed J. Carney who, obviously following instructions, wasted a lot of time saying what we already knew about your programs. He finally did point out your position of being willing to compromise and seek consensus but not move without that compromise.
 As I said in my letter of April 7, I understand and appreciate this line of approach. What is troubling is that the budget areas which you seek to use to find consensus are the very areas of  life we fought and died by the millions to create a Government of, for, and by the people to establish and protect.
These are the areas of our Common Good and our General Welfare. I am thinking not just of Social Security and Medicare, but all of the programs including the protections for suffrage,  the Union programs, the principle of free education for every person, veterans benefits, which paid for my degrees.
You know these programs well. They have been labeled "social programs" and made to appear that they are for the benefit of the lazy, stupid, and old, because the wealthy do not need and do not want any of them. You understand, no doubt, the price people paid often in blood to get those programs in place. These are not bargaining chips any more than free speech or equality under the Law are a bargaining chips.
To find consensus requires Goodwill on both sides. This frequency is not remotely apparent in the individuals whom you are facing on this field. You have at your back the love and will of a huge part of the people, not only of these United States but of the Common People of the world. If we are to be a model of government of, for, and by the people we need to act that way. The bargaining away of the issues on gun control was not necessary. We do not have to give away those things for which we so painfully struggled to gain for all of our brothers and sisters.
This present  struggle is not going on so obviously on the dense physical plane as was the struggle in which the planet was engaged in the last two world wars; however, the stakes, liberty and justice for all, are virtually the same.  It is time to use the so called nuclear option. What we have gained is not for sale or trade.
lots of love
-tom

No comments:

Post a Comment